Friday, December 19, 2008

Antidepressants may damage more sex lives

Such sexual symptoms have long been known side effects of the popular Prozac class of antidepressants, but a growing body of research suggests that they are far more common than previously thought, perhaps affecting half or more of patients.

And a handful of recent medical and psychological journal articles document a small number of cases in which sexual problems remain even after a patient goes off the drugs.

"This is such an upsetting issue," said Aline Zoldbrod, a Lexington psychologist and sex therapist. "There are people for whom SSRIs are really life-saving, I think, but the idea that someone would have to choose between getting out of the darkness of depression and having a good sex life is horrible."

Current warnings on the labels of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, cite early studies in which the prevalence of sexual side effects was lower: 4 percent for Prozac, for example, and ranging from 0 to 28 percent for Paxil.

But more recent studies, in which patients were more likely to be asked about specific sexual side effects and thus more likely to report them, suggest that the ballpark range of those affected by SSRIs is between 30 percent and 50 percent, said researchers including Dr. Richard Balon, a psychiatry professor at Wayne State University who studies the symptoms.

That would translate into millions of affected sex lives among the estimated 1 in 8 American adults who have tried these antidepressants in the past decade or so. Some studies have found the range still higher.

In fact, the dampening sexual effects can be so dramatic that in recent years, the antidepressants have become the leading treatment for premature ejaculation, a study last year found, though they are not approved for that use by the FDA.

"I tell patients there's a good chance they may have sexual problems" while on the antidepressants, "with the most frequent being delayed orgasm," Balon said.

Representatives of some of the companies that make SSRIs pointed out that sexual dysfunction is complex to measure. Patients may be reluctant to discuss it, and it is hard to distinguish issues caused by the drug from problems caused by the underlying mental illness, by diseases such as diabetes, or by other medications, they said. The Prozac label states that "There are no adequate and well-controlled studies examining sexual dysfunction" of patients on Prozac.



In the past two or three years, scattered published case reports from around the country have described patients whose sexual symptoms failed to resolve after going off antidepressants.

Dr. Robert P. Kauffman, chair of obstetrics and gynecology at Texas Tech University, has published accounts of three cases in his practice. "It's probably a small number of men and women," he said, "but I really think it deserves investigation."

Psychologist Audrey Bahrick at the University of Iowa said she became concerned when she observed that several clients whom she followed went off SSRIs and "very, very credibly to me, they did not recover" sexually.

Among their symptoms, she said, were "telltale signs" of SSRI-caused dysfunction, unrelated to the known effects of mental illness. They had "pleasureless orgasms," and "genital anesthesia," in which sex feels no more intense than a handshake. She became particularly concerned about adolescents put on antidepressants, whose sexuality might never have a chance to develop normally.

Bahrick began to explore. She found that post-SSRI sexual effects had never been systematically studied, but she came across a Yahoo group called SSRIsex, a support group for people with "persistent SSRI sexual side effects" that now has more than 1,800 members.

Among them was Kevin Bennett, a 30-year-old whose sexual function was normal until he was prescribed Prozac at age 18, and who has been impotent ever since, he says; his doctors can find no alternative explanation.

Both Bahrick and Bennett spoke about SSRI effects at a panel of the American Psychological Association last year.

Still, skepticism among psychiatrists remains. Balon said he has seen no such cases in his practice, though he does not rule out the possibility that the syndrome is rare but real. GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Paxil, "has not identified sexual dysfunction post-treatment as a safety signal," spokeswoman Sarah Alspach said in an e-mail.

Response to "SSRI Birth defects- The facts"

It seems as though my topic focus has shifted a little after researching further. Now leaning more towards the dangers of SSRI rather then the effects it has on brain chemistry. I think somehow the dangers and the brain chemistry part are going to connect, and obviously have something to do with each other. Back to what I found in previous articles, it seems that the pharmaceutical companies aren't focusing in the right area. When meeting your doctor or pharmacists should you have to shake his hand and wonder where his morality stands? Or should you just trust what he says because "he's a doctor". I think pharmaceutical companies should have to reprint there warning label on pill bottles. At the same time I could completely contradict my self...although I haven't looked into this much yet, but when you pick up your prescription pills you get a little booklet type thing that tells you all sorts of things about the drug you are taking. I makes me wonder if people take the time to read these. I understand that getting pregnant is unexpected but I'd also like to know how many of these woman where purposely trying to get pregnant and how many it accidentally happened to. Because if this drug is altering your brain this much don't you think it would alter something growing inside of you?

This piece from the article(below) should be placed on every pill bottle, as well as the pharmacists/ doctor mentioning to you these side effects.

"Heart defects are also associated with SSRI birth defects, namely Zoloft, Celexa, Prozac and Paxil. In 2005 the FDA issued a public health warning regarding Paxil, based on findings from 2 studies which showed up to a 2 times greater risk of having a baby with a heart birth defect while on Paxil. In conjunction with the warning, the FDA placed Paxil in its second highest category of drugs known to cause birth defects."


Another question of mine is does it only effect the baby if you're taking it during the gestation period or does it also have a long term effect...say you've been taking it since you were 20 and you're now 23 and ready to have a baby. Is it going to effect them in any way?


SSRI Birth Defects – The Facts

SSRIs – or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors--are a class of drug used to treat depression. Lexapro, also known generically as escitalopram oxalate, is an SSRI. The manufacturer of Lexapro, Forest Pharmaceutical, downplays the drug's dangers. Nowhere on its website is there any warning of possible side effects if taking the drug while pregnant, even though SSRIs have been linked to serious birth defects in babies.

On July 19, 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Health Advisory to alert the public to the risks associated with taking SSRIs while pregnant. The advisory was based on a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine that found that mothers who took SSRIs like Lexapro during the second half of their pregnancy were 6 times more likely to have a baby with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension in the Newborn (PPHN) than those who did not take SSRIs late in pregnancy.

Heart defects are also associated with SSRI birth defects, namely Zoloft, Celexa, Prozac and Paxil. In 2005 the FDA issued a public health warning regarding Paxil, based on findings from 2 studies which showed up to a 2 times greater risk of having a baby with a heart birth defect while on Paxil. In conjunction with the warning, the FDA placed Paxil in its second highest category of drugs known to cause birth defects.
Most recently, a study published in the November 2008 issue of the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, reported a 3 times greater risk for heart defects in babies born to mothers taking either Prozac (fluoxetine) or Paxil. The study looked at babies born to 800 women who said they took either drug during the first trimesters of their pregnancies. Comparison was then made to 1,400 expectant mothers who were not on antidepressants of any kind.

Given this information Ann has good reason to be suspicious as to the cause of her son's heart defect and pulmonary hypertension. "My daughter is as healthy as can be. Then they put me on lexapro, and my son was born with these health problems," she said. If you were Ann, what conclusions would you draw?

Response to "antidepressants being conducted in secret"

This article was very informational I would have never expected some of the things I read. A lot of what I read was generally about the same thing, which was parents being upset with doctors for not being given correct warning as to how these drugs will effect there chilred along with confidentiality. This left me not much room to say much with out repeating myself. while reading this article I came across this "In another case a 14-year-old girl became suicidal after taking Zoloft. Her parents said they were not warned this might happen nor told to monitor her for symptoms of suicidal thoughts or self-harm." after reading this i was very shocked that parents were not notified about possible side effects. This is a serious drug that can, and does alter brain chemistry. It seems to me pharmaceutical companies care more about the money they will be making then the well being of those who are consuming the drugs. Along with doctors trying to keep confidentiality but in turn parents being upset with them for not sharing this serious information. I'm caught between sides because moraly I think its a doctors right to keep things condential but at the same time if its putting some one in harms way then shoulndt that bond of confidentiality be broken?

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

A good start - but incomplete!

Emily - a good beginning, but you need to work on citations, notes, responses. . .see me if you have questions. Fourth article is due this Friday, December 19.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

anti-depressants being conducted 'in secret'


"Although there has not been a jump in adverse events from SSRIs, there has been community concern about potential overuse," said the TGA

Medicare stats show that, since 1990, when Prozac first was on pharmacy shelves, there have been almost 10,000 reports of suspected adverse reactions to SSRIs.

Over 12 million SSRI antidepressant scripts were subsidized by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme last year.

psychiatrist Yolande Lucire, has reported between 300 and 400 cases to the TGA which she claims patients have had serious reactions to the anti-depressants, a few who had committed suicide. This inquiry must be made public.

"This is being done in secret. We have no terms of reference, no opportunity for people to make submissions; it's a scandal." Says Dr.Lucire

Federal Health Department secretary Jane Halton wrote to Dr Lucire telling her that her inquiry was under way and the panel would report back to her at the end of this year.

"This only happened after," Dr Lucire said. "In frustration at being fobbed off by the TGA, I personally sent the head of the department 100 cases detailing what had actually happened to people who went from being fully functioning members of the community to patients with serious mental health problems and some who in fact killed themselves after being put on these drugs for stress-related disorders."

The TGA asked all drug companies that market SSRI anti-depressants in Australia to update the wording of their suicide warnings concerning children and young people under 24 years.

investigation revealed several hundred thousand prescriptions for anti-depressants like Zoloft and Prozac were last year prescribed to children and subsidized through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, despite the TGA and Pfizer, the company that markets Zoloft in Australia, recommending they not be prescribed to anyone under the age of 24.

Significant discrepancies in the information given to parents about the potential dangers of the drugs to children were also uncovered.

Two weeks ago, Melbourne mother reached a confidential court settlement with her 16-year-old daughter's GP, who she had sued for prescribing Zoloft to her daughter for depression.

Mulcahey claimed the drug made her daughter suicidal and said she was not advised of the risks.

In another case a 14-year-old girl became suicidal after taking Zoloft. Her parents said they were not warned this might happen nor told to monitor her for symptoms of suicidal thoughts or self-harm.

"But in the general setting I would say that nothing new in the literature suggests we need to be any more vigilant than we already have been when it comes to documenting the side effects of this class of drug," Dr Kitching said.

Friday, October 31, 2008

I think that all your topics are good ones, and I agree with you that some of them would be harder to research than others. Especially when it comes down to the whole youtube controversy. Many people do use and abuse that online network but it would be very hard to keep getting information because you would actually have to look for the bad stuff on youtube, and I don't know if I could take that mentally. It would be really tough, plus you would also have to fight the school system to get information. SSRIs sound like the best bet kid. GOOD LUCK!

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Emily's Review

I really liked all three of your topics! But your last topic, SSRI's was very interesting. I think that you will be able to find alot of ongoing information to keep you busy for the length of time we have to research. You could interview people in the medical field to see what their opinions are about SSRI's. I'm sure that you will be able to find alot of information online, in books, magazines, and in the newspapers. I think that your last topic will keep you interested for a while, and I can't wait to hear more about what you have researched.
It sounds like you already have the topic you really want to do. It sounds like a really interesting topic and you're going to have a lot of currency because docotors are always changing and reasearching and trying new things. I would look into medical magazines I think you can find some online, a lot of those have intersting articles that really pick apart pros and cons of the situation. Also looking for interviews with people that have expierenced the medical procedures your writing about would really help your paper be relateable. I think your idea about really working with the brain and how the medicane effects a human sounds like a hit. You could write 50 pages on the brain and our minds and how it all fits together.
Good Luck!

Friday, October 24, 2008

My First Research

This year I'm very excited about doing my I Search paper because I'm going to be able to study my topic more in-depth then I was able to last year with the amount of time I'm given. The things I was most interested in studying were SSRI's and there affect on the brain, YouTube's pros and cons, and Nature. Vs. Nurture is it in our DNA or do we learn to behave that way?

I was very interested in SSRI's after reading an article in a magazine about teens and antidepressants. In the article it talked about how SSRI's work and the pros and cons of using that as a method to solve depression. While I was researching SSRI's I found it very easy to use all of the search engines/tools. It seemed to be a current topic that is constantly being updated. Doctors and pharmacists are constantly looking for alternative ways to treat depression. I found Google News and Marvel to be very helpful. Google News was most helpful though. Google news is updated by the minute so any time a new article is posted it comes up in your search results which I like because they were all very current unlike some that came while searching Marvel.

My second choice was YouTube and its pros and cons as well as how it affects today's youth. I decide this was something I was interested in because with all the talk on the news about girls fighting girls in middle school bathrooms and then posting it on YouTube for others to watch left me dumbfounded and wanting to know more about how YouTube is used and abused. It was really hard to find articles on Google news about this because the school has it blocked which meant I had to change my search a little bit to social networking. Once I did that I got a lot of hits, but nothing that sparked my interest. The databases were more helpful on this topic because they didn't block articles that mentioned things about YouTube. After researching about YouTube, although it will always be changing with the constant video uploads I don't think its something that could keep me interested for 6 months.

My third choice was Nature. Vs. Nurture, out of all three topics of interest this was the hardest to find current information. Google nor the Databases really had anything I wanted to read, it was mostly books about this topic or how this topic is intertwined in many other areas.

Over all I was most intrigued by SSRI’s and the affect on the brain, it struck me as something I could keep myself interested in for the next 6 months.